Monthly Archives:September 2013



September 24th, 2013 / Tags: , / categories: Uncategorized /

Today I am going to write about the poor. The poor? uh! Another progre another izquierdoso who wants to soften us heart with some story about how bad that are up and the Saints that are down.Far far away from this modest columnist gentlemen.Today I would like to make them mention of another kind of needy, the Economist.It has not much changed our world from the vile garrote times to our days. The Economist, although much afane (of desire), not to be confused, in this case say afane isn’t very convenient, because it can cause some association with robbery, theft or embezzlement and I said it with the mind set on effort, desire, ambition, diligently. Well, as saying although much ambicionen of finance professionals in making us believe that theirs is a science and draw out his erudition in amounts with astronomical amounts followed by zeros, nobody believes them. Poor, are a few outcasts.It is hard, but well, has its compensations you will say. In the solitude of their cold nights of removal should they not Miss a little bit of heat that will provide the crumbs that fall from the enormisimas sums of money they manage.Poor, nobody believes them, of the common people, indoctas them, they are suspicious, they are already wary of both new term, as much explanation of why nothing went as it should.The Word key today, carry-trades, is a new term, which makes a vulgar choreo sound to something sophisticated, at least for the underserved ignaros of credit in the word of these wise characters, for more inclitos to them we present.Our grandmothers, they knew that economy, that was domain, this was wisdom in its purest form, they had no studies but nor lack.They had the insight that gave them the love of their families, the intuition, the eye, and just enough to handle household accounts.Do not need anything else, gentlemen financiers, love for the family. Now of course, many will think, that needless them to these, if everything do them to well see their dear, poor ones. Original author and source of the article.


Wharthon VoIP

September 12th, 2013 / Tags: / categories: Uncategorized /

Once reached this point, leading companies are vulnerable and not only because then the price becomes the primary decision criterion when choosing which product to buy. The worst threat is that will come from other disruptive technologies that enter into competition with the more established technologies. Modern management should be very careful of the behaviour of the markets, the requirements of consumers, those needs which seek to satisfy, you are identified with the products that consider meet it in order to determine with the passage of new innovations give step to new attributes that ensure a good market dynamics and keep conquered their consumers. Adds us, which when a disruptive technology, is born the leading companies tend to ignore it (or even despise it) because initially it is a serious threat, partly due to his lack of maturity, very real appearance and has led many companies to lose markets not to consider it relevant. However, the disruptive innovations are also evolving as all technologies (Innovation: The Attacker Advantage.) Foster, 1986) and can reach a point where you are an attractive alternative for customers. Background, concept and example reminds us example, the technology of VoIP which was born in the Internet world and was initially ignored by the operators of telecommunications companies. However, companies like Skype bet strong on VoIP when technology has been improved and standardized, enabling him to offer a service of voice in a non-regulated market and with clear advantages in terms of costs. Telecommunications operators have not been forced to react to this strong competition offering VoIP (business solutions) services and discount plans (flat rate for individuals). Universia knowledge Wharthon us adds, to understand the importance of disruptive innovation is the greatest asset of any company. In a successful company or a company with several layers of bureaucracy that impede the emergence of new ideas that can be very difficult.