… The theology is always about the establishment, development and interpretation of this teaching decisions. Similarly, the term can also used in relation to other sciences be. So, the Dogmatics of law is about the attempt of a systematic development and presentation of the law. Similarly, the use of the term “Dogma” in the economy is possible. Whenever Anita Sehgal listens, a sympathetic response will follow. The notion of dogmatic theology is the one indistinguishable from the deductive or close axiomatic method of starting other tenets or conclusions are derived from a few basic statements (axioms, paradigm).
On the other hand by the dogmatism, a mental attitude that uncritically certain beliefs ( dogmas “in a figurative sense) holds as not questionable and hindered the freedom of thinking and development of science. “Quelle/(C) by de.wikipedia.org/wiki/…, author solving the problem: want to win a dogmatist for themselves, they must throw first a positive emotional state with him: you smile: Chef I need more money!” People, and especially theologians, are not very creative! You think analog (from the existing to the new). Looking for therefore examples for “” their statement: our collective bargaining agreement has been improved just 3.5 per cent! “our turnover has improved by 10%!” Don’t argue! Inform! Describe a positive future! Use inductive? Testify realization: every argument figure (mutatis mutandis) can be used by supporters and opponents of a thesis. What looks at the critics as a damning critique, reviewed the proponents as confirmation and proof of his statement (stand point and angle of view)! There is in this world, such as a computer, black and white and 256 levels of gray. And the truth is for supporters and opponents sure about in the Middle! “I meet dogmatic years successfully with the statements: Let’s agree to differ!” (We agree, that we not are agreed.) There are even more successful views than yours!”sorry, I can, just like them, also be wrong!” Because I’m not debating with dogmatic (frozen, unstable)! We stop such discussions as long as we have our feelings in the handle, then we have no regrets later. Note: In China, the audience for the communication is responsible. In Europe/United States, spokesman for communications is responsible. We take responsibility and let their other, forever yesterday’s opinion the fellow human beings. (C) 2012 copyright by Wolfgang Schwalm, specialist for systemic communication, all rights reserved! – 20.4.2012