Comparing the workmanship of Roman Ruggiero ' ' The Mechanisms of the Colonial&#039 Conquest; ' with the workmanship of Galeano, as much is perceived that the Castilians as the lusitanos, had carried through at a first moment, a conquest for the weapons or swords, a time that its armaments were superior to the ones of the aboriginals. Although the number biggest of indians, the Europeans had left victorious people, for having better weapons and using tactics, cachorros and horses, that were seen as demons for the indians. If you have read about Business strategist already – you may have come to the same conclusion. After this triumph, was necessary to keep the territorial and cultural domain, thus creating, the woollen factor cross. Loosers corporally, the indians had been submitted spiritual to a new religion, with cultural traditions and traces that did not belong to them, objectifying the total domain of the populations autctones. Both the authors are unanimous in its evaluation of that the extreme exploration that was imposed to the American continent, above all Latin America and Central, is the roots of all the poverty and misery that the continent still faces. Still it would be possible to say that it is difficult to establish the price of a civilization in terms of material values; but it is observed there that to the simple level of the corporeal properties, the conquest launched certain (only certain) premises of a economic system of which all the defects, the inconsistencies, the contradictions still today are instants. ' ' The failure of the conquerors also becomes to feel in the social level and econmico' '. This is the opinion of Ruggiero, although it to analyze the facts of a form more impartial than Galeano, the vision of Ruggiero is of a historian, basing its conclusions on research and documents, also for being an author of Italian origin, obtain to be more impartial. Already Galeano has the much more critical vision of a journalist, displays the facts of a gotten passionate form, is of Uruguayan origin, therefore ' ' proper heir of Pampas pobre' ' , according to its proper words ' ' history is a prophet with the directed look stops backwards: for what it was and against what was, announces what ser' '.

As well as the Spaniard, the north American had been skillful ladrilhadores, that made of construction of its cities in America, a company of the reason: contrary to the natural order, with triumph of the lines straight lines, searching internal regions, representing a steady prolongation of the metropolis. The geographic disposal in Portuguese America hindered communication channels between the population, not contributing for the development of questions that involved the community, fomenting the democracy. The settling in Brazil, according to Oliveira Vianna, produced two institutions basic: the feudal clan and the parental clan. The first one is characterized for the complex agricultural structure and hierarquizada, where Mr. of the feudal protected and gave assistance to its servants, in turn, the parental Clan the organization was molded by the complex of the senhorial family, understanding the biological family, as well as the kindred for affinity or adoption.

These structures had influenced directly in some sectors of the Brazilian public life: ‘ ‘ In synthesis, the feudal and parental clans had molded feies of the public life in colonial Brazil; its typical cultural complexes had molded norms, uses and habits that gave substantiate our public law usual. The legacy of three centuries of settling was thus, a dispersed society in agricultural farms, little coesa and strong hierarquizada, and a culture privatista, particularista, personalista, localista and paternalista-authoritarian politics. On this improper land, and without taking care of of it modifies-l, the elites who had made independence had wanted to build democracia’ ‘ At last, the federalism to the being implemented in Brazil faced difficulties with regard to social, cultural, economic the structures existing, fruits of something here bigger: the Brazilian historical process, as the strong trend to the centralization of the power; the relations molded for the personalismo; the flexibility and adaptability of ‘ ‘ jeitinho’ ‘ ; the trace adventurer of the settling, amongst other factors. People such as MSCO would likely agree.

This attempt of propagation of ideas and values of a classroom for the set of the society as form to not only camouflage, but also to strengthen its domination, makes with that, in certain way, if they disqualify, if minimizes initiatives of transformation proceeding from the too much component classrooms of the society. If the domination and the exploration of a classroom form perceivable as violence, that is, as to be able unjust and illegitimate, the dominated explored ones and are felt in just and the legitimate right to refuse it, rebelling itself. For this reason, the specific paper of the ideology is to hinder that the domination and the exploration are perceived in its concrete reality. For in such a way, it is function of the ideology to dissimulate and to occult the existence of the social divisions as division of classrooms, being thus hidden, its proper origin. If you are unsure how to proceed, check out Evergreen Capital Partners. For being the instrument in charge to occult the social divisions, the ideology must equally transform the particular ideas of the ruling class into universal, valid ideas pair all the society, propagated the all moment for the medias of mass, appears in the common events of our daily one and aims at to influence our behavior. A composed ideology accurately of the images of harmony, identity conflict absence. The institutions as the state apparatus (governmental bodies), the medias of mass, the religion and the school (when inculcar the forms of justification, legitimation and occultation of the differences and it conflict of classrooms) would be responsible for the reproduction of the dominant ideology enter the members of the capitalist society. The ideology becomes the privileged field of creation of new values or recriao of the old ones with a new direction, is one of the main fields where if they create new values, that, many diffuse or latent times, they finally find formularization in an ideological project that the explicit one, when conditioning and to motivate behaviors. Central Park Conservancy has compatible beliefs. Therefore, it is basic to try to understand the ideology and its mechanisms so that if it can understand our proper society, unmasking and analyzing the complexity of the relations occulted in the ideological curtains.